The Ward Boundary and Council Composition Review is moving into its next phase. An interim report will be presented to Council in November, outlining preliminary findings and options for further community engagement.

The consultant has also gathered several key themes from the first round of community discussions, which we have shared below to help inform the ongoing review process.

Theme 1: Equitable Representation Between Wards

A key concern raised was the imbalance in representation between the two wards. Many participants felt that the current structure, where Ward 1 is represented by four councillors and Ward 2 by two, creates unfairness both geographically and demographically. However, others appreciated that the existing system maintains distinct communities of interest, with Ward 1 reflecting more urban priorities and Ward 2 representing rural perspectives.

Theme 2: Size of Council and Deputy Mayor Selection

Participants also discussed the composition of Council and how the Deputy Mayor is selected. While some agreed that having six councillors remains appropriate, others suggested structural adjustments to improve balance or efficiency. Ideas included electing a Deputy Mayor at large or even reducing the overall number of councillors to streamline decision-making.

Theme 3: Fairness in Services and Tax Allocation

Concerns about fairness and representation extended to how services and taxes are distributed across wards. Several respondents felt that the existing ward boundaries may influence perceptions of inequity in service levels and tax contributions.

Theme 4: Planning for Port Hope’s Future

Looking ahead, many participants emphasized the importance of considering future growth, development, and environmental protection. Feedback highlighted concerns about preserving farmland and greenbelt areas, as well as ensuring that rural infrastructure can accommodate future needs.

Theme 5: Exploring an “At-Large” System of Representation

There was notable interest in exploring an at-large system for electing councillors. Some respondents felt this approach could help reduce divisions between urban and rural areas and encourage a more unified community perspective and reduce the “us vs. them” mentality that has emerged between the wards.